An updated WebRTC FAQ for those who wish to understand this tech somewhat better.
It is 2018, and it seems like there’s no good FAQ for WebRTC. Nowhere. They’re just not up to date. That, coupled with my own need to be the best source of information on the web about WebRTC (and the fact that my last few articles were more about CPaaS and messaging than WebRTC), got me to write this one.
What is WebRTC?
WebRTC is both a standard specification and an open source project.
WebRTC allows sending and receiving of real time voice, video and arbitrary data across browsers and other devices. This means we now have an easy way as users to conduct voice and video conferences from a browser or from our mobile devices. WebRTC can do a lot more than that, but voice and video in real time is the basis of what you get out of it.
There’s a short video explaining What is WebRTC on my site.
Who is behind WebRTC?
WebRTC originated from Google. It started by an acquisition of a few companies, whose technology was then repackaged and released as open source under the name of WebRTC.
Google is still the main vendor behind WebRTC. That’s because its own WebRTC engine is the main WebRTC open source project out there and it is also the one that gets integrated into the Chrome browser.
Mozilla, Microsoft and Apple all contribute to WebRTC and have their own implementations of WebRTC in their browsers (some of these implementations are derived from the Google code).
Other vendors and individuals contribute to the specification through the IETF and W3C, where the standardization process of WebRTC takes place.
My own contribution to WebRTC is this site, which publishes a lot of free information around WebRTC as well as the Kranky Geek event, and WebRTC Glossary.
Is WebRTC ready for commercial use?
Yes.
WebRTC is used today by commercial services (here are 10 such examples).
Some complain and gripe that WebRTC isn’t ready for commercial use. This stems due to the many changes that the codebase and specification is undergoing. It also means that if you plan on using WebRTC, either do that through a third party managed service (a CPaaS vendor – list here) or make sure to have a team of savvy developers that can keep up with the pace.
The changes introduced to the WebRTC codebase itself oftentimes breaks backward compatibility and features, probably by sticking to a “move fast and break things” motto to some extent.
Why should I use WebRTC?
If you don’t need real time voice and video then you might not need to use WebRTC at all.
If you do, then it is a matter of capability, resources and time to market:
- If you want your service to work inside a web browser, then WebRTC is your only way of getting real time voice and video into a browser
- If you want it elsewhere, then in almost all cases, using WebRTC will cost you less and get you there faster than the alternatives
What codecs are used in WebRTC?
For voice, the mandatory codecs are G.711 and Opus. Out of these two, be sure to use Opus (G.711 is old and crappy).
For video, the mandatory codecs are VP8 and H.264. Apple’s Safari browser doesn’t support VP8. And on Android, Chrome won’t support H.264 on *some* devices (I’ll let you go figure out on which ones). More about that in this video mini-series.
VP9 is supported by Chrome and Firefox. AV1 seems to be the future.
What browsers support WebRTC?
All of them. Almost. But not exactly. And there are differences.
- Chrome is where most developers focus. It isn’t 100% aligned with the specification yet (none of the browsers are)
- Firefox is the next that gets focus from developers. Close enough to Chrome in its implementation
- Edge doesn’t support data channels. And many skip it when it comes to testing due to is low market adoption
- Safari is what everyone wants (Apple you know), but it is still buggy and doesn’t have support for VP8. Most need Safari support for iOS but are fine with not supporting Safari on Mac. Read this webrtcHacks post for more
There’s a devices cheat sheet on my website.
And then there’s adapter.js which you should definitely use.
Can I use WebRTC on mobile devices?
Yes.
On Android, on official Chrome and Firefox browsers, WebRTC is available.
On iOS, Safari offers something usable if you are willing to invest the energy to get it working well.
On both Android and iOS you can take the WebRTC source code and integrate it inside your native application. Google even releases prebuilt packages for both Android and iOS.
If you want to use a Webview inside your app, then this is easy with Android, restrictive with iOS for now (you won’t be able to access the camera or the microphone there).
Do I need special servers to run WebRTC?
Yes.
You definitely need a signaling server. And STUN/TURN server. You might need a media server.
WebRTC is said to be peer-to-peer. It is when it comes to the media as much as possible. But developers can make use of it in server centric environments. And there are some scenarios where it makes no technical sense to use peer-to-peer (for example if you want to broadcast something to a million people or conduct a video conference with 20 participants).
There’s a free video mini series explaining WebRTC servers on this site.
Can WebRTC be used to create large conferences?
Yap.
Think of WebRTC as a basic building block that gives you superpowers. With it you have the ability to send and receive voice and video in real time virtually on every device and browser.
Now what you do with this superpower, how you interact with it, architect your solution around it – that’s up to you.
There are vendors offering video conferencing that uses WebRTC and gets to 10’s of participants. Webinars with 100’s of live viewers in the audience.
You can read more about scale and size of WebRTC.
Is WebRTC posing a security threat for me?
No.
And yes.
Depending who you are and what are your needs.
I wrote a lot about WebRTC security in the past. It gets tiring.
WebRTC comes with security in mind. It encrypts everything. Can’t remove that encryption. And browsers get security updates faster than any other software you have.
The one sticking issue is probably the fact that it exposes the local IP address of your machine when it is used. VPNs that are implemented properly solve that as well. More about that over at webrtcHacks and VPN leaks.
What does WebRTC 1.0 mean?
WebRTC 1.0 is the first time that WebRTC will have an official specification.
Up until now, we had drafts and browser implementations that were an approximation of the drafts. Now we have an approximation of the WebRTC 1.0 specification and approximations of implementations to it in browsers.
Confused?
Don’t be. Assume WebRTC is good to go commercially (check that part of my FAQ) and just go read Jan-Ivar’s explanation @ Mozilla’s Advancing WebRTC blog.
Oh – and be sure to use adapter.js.
How much does WebRTC cost?
It doesn’t. And it does.
WebRTC is freely available in browsers.
The source code is also freely available.
The servers you will need to use it – someone will need to pay for them. That payment can be to a managed service, or to a cloud vendors and developers who will develop, install and maintain them. Up to you to decide.
Oftentimes, developers assume everything should be free with WebRTC, whereas reality is different. And for some reason, most perceive development costs as free or sunk costs (they will call it investment) as opposed to paying a third party for doing the hard stuff for you.
A bit more on this here.
How can I learn more about WebRTC?
If you are into free, then try reading the specs, playing with the official samples, reading this blog and webrtcHacks.
There are a few courses on coursera, pluralsight and elsewhere. Never tried them, but read their agendas. Take a look for yourself and decide what’s for you.
There are books, but none of them is up to date with the specification.
Best place? Hands down? My courses at webrtccourse.com.
Can I help you?
Maybe.
There’s my course. There’s testRTC where I am a co-founder (we do testing and monitoring of WebRTC apps).
I also consult. Around architecture, vendor selection, defining requirements, setting roadmaps, working on differentiation and doing pure marketing related work. What can I say?
I like the variety.
You can reach out to me here.
–
Got a question about WebRTC that needs to go into this FAQ? Add it below in the comments.
“Is WebRTC posing a security threat for me?”
Yes, if your signalling solution is not end-to-end encrypted, man in the middle attacks are easily doable. IMHO an underrated attack surface.
I’d say that is a reply that is suitable for 100% of all services running on the web inside browsers. If the developers who put up the service you use didn’t secure it, then it isn’t secure.
Now sure how what you’re saying is any different than a man in the middle attack in front of a bank website, airline service or any text chat service.
I understand that peer to peer connection does not work with Safari, but if I have Chrome on my end, can I setup a one-way connection? To clarify, the person with Chrome would be in effect broadcasting and the person with Safari would not even be asked to use his audio or video.
Peer to peer connections with Safari works well. Not easy, but doable. Video will need to be H.264 with Safari.
And broadcasting to Safari from Chrome (directly, or via a media server) is possible as well.
Do you know of any way to use webrtc through an ionic ios app? I haven’t found any solution and assume it isn’t possible without using a 3rd party provider.
Bob, I don’t know one directly, but I don’t think there’s technical issue in adding it.
As a practical matter, the G.722 audio codec is supported in Chrome and Firefox. This provides a happy middle ground for integration of IP telephony and WebRTC without resorting to (ugh!) G.711.
We make use of this every day, allowing WebRTC interaction with ZipDX, which was the world’s first HDVoice conference service.
Thanks for sharing this Michael