Comments on: Video meetings guest access: the new frontier of interoperability https://bloggeek.me/video-meetings-guest-access-interoperability/ The leading authority on WebRTC Sun, 09 Aug 2020 13:16:21 +0000 hourly 1 By: Tsahi Levent-Levi https://bloggeek.me/video-meetings-guest-access-interoperability/#comment-122908 Sun, 09 Aug 2020 13:16:21 +0000 https://bloggeek.me/?p=71837#comment-122908 In reply to Gavin Henry.

Nothing changes I fear.

Federation isn’t in the interest of most of the vendors, especially not the bigger ones.

]]>
By: Gavin Henry https://bloggeek.me/video-meetings-guest-access-interoperability/#comment-122907 Sun, 09 Aug 2020 13:01:15 +0000 https://bloggeek.me/?p=71837#comment-122907 What does this look like post lockdown Aug 2020?

Could have been done with XMPP Federation?

]]>
By: Tsahi Levent-Levi https://bloggeek.me/video-meetings-guest-access-interoperability/#comment-119966 Wed, 18 Dec 2019 13:59:39 +0000 https://bloggeek.me/?p=71837#comment-119966 In reply to Anders Myklebost.

Anders,

Andy explains this best in his recent post: https://andyabramson.blogs.com/voipwatch/2019/12/zoom-is-eating-fuze-and-bluejeans-lunch.html

Having the right technology isn’t a guarantee for success. Zoom is eating up the lunch of many video centric services. And the rest gets squeezed out due to the ever growing roster of startups (and big companies) introducing video services via WebRTC.

]]>
By: Anders Myklebost https://bloggeek.me/video-meetings-guest-access-interoperability/#comment-119962 Wed, 18 Dec 2019 09:21:51 +0000 https://bloggeek.me/?p=71837#comment-119962 Hi Tsahi,

Thank you for a great article.

How will this affect Blue Jeans, Pexip etc?

Cheers
Anders

]]>
By: Aswath Rao https://bloggeek.me/video-meetings-guest-access-interoperability/#comment-119896 Wed, 20 Nov 2019 13:23:32 +0000 https://bloggeek.me/?p=71837#comment-119896 As you point out guest access has been available for a while. I think the noteworthy item is that the downloaded call control JS can drive the other system’s UI.

]]>
By: Tsahi Levent-Levi https://bloggeek.me/video-meetings-guest-access-interoperability/#comment-119885 Thu, 14 Nov 2019 03:33:19 +0000 https://bloggeek.me/?p=71837#comment-119885 In reply to Philipp Hancke.

🙂

]]>
By: Philipp Hancke https://bloggeek.me/video-meetings-guest-access-interoperability/#comment-119884 Wed, 13 Nov 2019 16:34:44 +0000 https://bloggeek.me/?p=71837#comment-119884 Originally “federation” described the email-like world where all the stuff you describe wasn’t necessary. Sad that Microsoft took over the term…

]]>
By: Tsahi Levent-Levi https://bloggeek.me/video-meetings-guest-access-interoperability/#comment-119883 Wed, 13 Nov 2019 03:40:48 +0000 https://bloggeek.me/?p=71837#comment-119883 In reply to Ham.

Thanks for the insights Ham

]]>
By: Tsahi Levent-Levi https://bloggeek.me/video-meetings-guest-access-interoperability/#comment-119882 Wed, 13 Nov 2019 03:40:35 +0000 https://bloggeek.me/?p=71837#comment-119882 In reply to Silvia Pfeiffer.

I believe it is a Microsoft Teams URL can be opened by a Cisco WebEx Room system.

]]>
By: Ham https://bloggeek.me/video-meetings-guest-access-interoperability/#comment-119881 Wed, 13 Nov 2019 01:10:09 +0000 https://bloggeek.me/?p=71837#comment-119881 Great Article Tsahi!

I’ve mainly lived in Zoom enviornments over the last few career stops and never had an issue with Zoom’s WebRTC experience (though limited in feature parity to its desktop).

Interestingly Zoom also was earlier than MS or Cisco on bridging non federated to third party systems (WebEx, BJ) although riding H. 323 not through a WebRTC realm, and I believe Zoom just recently commited a similar commit to non federated interop with Teams.

Thanks for the insight!

Cheers,
Ham

]]>