Comments on: Winners and Losers of no MTI Video Codec in WebRTC https://bloggeek.me/winners-losers-no-mti-video-codec-webrtc/ The leading authority on WebRTC Sat, 28 Dec 2019 15:14:51 +0000 hourly 1 By: Tsahi Levent-Levi https://bloggeek.me/winners-losers-no-mti-video-codec-webrtc/#comment-117095 Sun, 17 Nov 2013 13:32:44 +0000 http://bloggeek.me/?p=3507#comment-117095 In reply to Jammy Huang.

Jammy,

Would love to meet Sagin again – missed you guys 🙂

Tsahi

]]> By: Jammy Huang https://bloggeek.me/winners-losers-no-mti-video-codec-webrtc/#comment-117094 Sun, 17 Nov 2013 03:46:49 +0000 http://bloggeek.me/?p=3507#comment-117094 Tsahi San,

I think that most of the people will appreciate your observation of the impact of the codec trend. I do hope that some one can finalize the codec issues so that two Quanta’s HW VP8 and H.264 encoder can sells more!

please meet my colleagues who will attend the WebRTC- Tim Shieh who has been the WebRTC advocate in Quanta Computer since day one and Sagin Hsu who is your old friend.

God bless us all!

Jammy

]]> By: Lennie https://bloggeek.me/winners-losers-no-mti-video-codec-webrtc/#comment-117093 Fri, 15 Nov 2013 14:53:56 +0000 http://bloggeek.me/?p=3507#comment-117093 If I listened correctly to the IETT RTCWeb WG meeting recording I think it is possible no MTI Video codec will be on the table as well.

I also see SHOULD or RECOMMENDED to implement instead of MUST on the mailinglist.

And also Theora and MPEG-1/H.261 were mentioned. It would be good to have even a lowquality fallback MTI video codec if there is no other MTI.

I can’t imagine G.711 was choosen because of it’s quality either 😉

]]>